500true dots under 250true true 800http://nucksiceman.com/wp-content/plugins/thethe-image-slider/style/skins/white-square-2
  • 5000 fade false 30 bottom 0
    Roberto Luongo
  • 5000 fade false 60 bottom 0
    Henrik Sedin
  • 5000 fade false 60 bottom 0
    Daniel Sedin
  • 5000 fade false 30 bottom 0
    Cory Schneider
  • 5000 fade false 30 bottom 0
    Ryan Kesler

The Top Five NHL Teams the League Needs to Move or Contract

Written by: Larry “The Nucks IceMan” Johnson

The NHL has had some attendance problems for a number of years, heck let’s be honest here, since expansion into certain parts of the United States. These areas have had their chance and it’s obvious from attendance records, millions of dollars in losses, and business groups’ lack of support that the interest is just not there.

There’s no use in trying to cram a sport down the throats of fans that have no interest in supporting it. It serves no purpose then, for the NHL to continue operations in those areas. I did some research, with the help of http://espn.go.com/nhl/attendance/ just to see what these figures actually looked like.

The following did not surprise me, because if you have have followed hockey for the past five years, you would have heard it discussed by the media on many occasions.

I picked five teams for relocation and realistically could have included several others, to evaluate their interest based on their attendance numbers. The loss of dollars would have been nice also, but lack of time dictated what I could muster up.

Since the 2005-06 season the NY Islanders have had the lowest average attendance with ranking numbers as follows: 30, 28, 30, 30, and 29.

In no particular order came the others, starting with Phoenix Coyotes – 22nd, 24th, 29, 28 30; Atlanta Thrashers – 23, 21, 22, 29, 28; Nashville Predators – 25, 23, 27, 28, 26 and Florida Panthers – 19, 22, 25, 24, 25.

NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman should acknowledge the failure in these areas and move them to locations, whether it is in Canada or the United States, that could, and would support them.

Going into its second season, the NHL has been running the Phoenix Coyotes, who after losing several hundred million dollars since their move to Phoenix, filed for bankruptcy in 2009. The league bought the team for $140 million and has been looking for buyers that would keep the franchise in Phoenix, much to the chagrin of most knowledgeable hockey enthusiasts.

There has been no less than five would-be buyers that have walked away from the sale, with the most recent being Matthew Hulsizer. Mr. Hulsizer started to get cold feet and wanted a big discount on the $165-million (all U.S. currency)  the league wanted for the team.

To Hulsizer and all of the rest I would say, “Excellent business decision”.

In the meantime there are a number of Canadian cities that could support any one of those teams, starting with Hamilton, who already have Copps Coliseum Arena with a capacity of 17,383, currently owned by the City of Hamilton. Yes the arena needs additions and upgrades to it, but the population in that area could surely support another NHL team.

Winnipeg and Quebec City would be a couple of others, although they would have to have arenas built to NHL standards. But the love and the support are still strong there.

In the United States, the NHL would be wise to look at current AHL cities that have the surrounding population to support a team. And if it’s not there, then wait.

The other choice for the NHL would be through contraction, but I don’t think the NHLPA would support something like that. Hey, maybe the owners would finally get tired of subsidizing the weaker teams and put this on the agenda for the next CBA.

Say you contracted down by three teams from the present and relocated two others. Think how much more talent would be available to upgrade the rest of the weaker teams. Not only that, but the parity would be on par like no other sports league today.

In conclusion, Garry Bettman and the league need to step up and make some difficult decisions. If the NHL is going to be recognized and taken seriously as a top five sport, then it needs to get out of areas where the fans are not interested.

As always, you can also find me at @twitter.com/nucksiceman.com, @slapshot.com and @communities.canada.com/VANCOUVERSUN/blogs/fanattic/default.aspx

2005-05 Home Games   Total      –      Avg.     - %

21 Hurricanes 41 639,454 15,596            
22 Coyotes 41 638,871 15,582            
23 Thrashers 41 637,578 15,550            
24 Ducks 41 620,380 15,131            
25 Predators 41 591,556 14,428            
26 Devils 41 583,448 14,230            
27 Blues 41 582,742 14,213            
28 Capitals 41 570,113 13,905            
29 Blackhawks 41 546,075 13,318            
30 NY Islanders 41 516,973 12,609            

2006-07     Home Games        Total     –       Avg. -           %

                       
21 Thrashers 41 665,862 16,240 87.6
22 Panthers 41 630,183 15,370 79.8
23 Predators 41 625,649 15,259 89.2
24 Coyotes 41 614,519 14,988 85.6
25 Bruins 41 605,352 14,764 84.1
26 Devils 41 581,225 14,176 74.5
27 Capitals 41 571,129 13,929 74.6
28 NY Islanders 41 528,331 12,886 79.1
29 Blackhawks 41 521,809 12,727 62.1
30 Blues 41 513,345 12,520 59.6
                                   

2007-08     Home Games     Total     – Avg. –  %

21 Kings 41        680,877  16,606  92.0            
22 Thrashers          41 649,081 15,831 85.4            
23 Devils 41 638,144 15,564 88.3            
24 Capitals 41 634,381 15,472 82.9            
25 Panthers 41 632,881 15,436 80.2            
26 Bruins 41 630,750 15,384 87.6            
27 Predators 41 611,328 14,910 87.1            
28 Blue Jackets 41 607,757 14,823 81.7            
29 Coyotes 41 607,638 14,820 84.7            
30 NY Islanders 41 559,247 13,640 83.7            

2008-09 Home Games       Total     – Avg. -    %

21 Lightning              41    676,409   16,497 85.6
22 Kings 41 676,042   16,488 89.1
23 Devils 41 647,397   15,790 89.6
24 Panthers 41 640,496   15,621 81.2
25 Blue Jackets 41 637,284   15,543 85.7
26 Avalanche 41 632,602   15,429 85.7
27 Predators 41 615,439   15,010 87.7
28 Coyotes 41 609,907   14,875 85.0
29 Thrashers 41 599,673   14,626 78.9
30 NY Islanders 41 564,697   13,773 84.5

2009-10 Home Games     Total     –  Avg. –     %

21 Lightning            41    635,388   15,497   78.4
22 Blue Jackets 41 632,086 15,416 85.0
23 Hurricanes 41 624,873 15,240 81.4
24 Ducks 41 621,903 15,168 88.3
25 Panthers 40 605,863 15,146 78.7
26 Predators 41 614,143 14,979 87.5
27 Avalanche 41 571,849 13,947 77.5
28 Thrashers 41 557,897 13,607 73.4
29 NY Islanders 41 522,168 12,735 78.1
30 Coyotes 41 491,558 11,989 68.5

Related posts:

Share

Comments are closed.

Switch to our mobile site